Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems | Vol.22, Issue.4 | 2017-05-10 | Pages 301-310
Development and evaluation of bus lanes with intermittent and dynamic priority in connected vehicle environment
Exclusive bus lanes provide a very high level of priority for transit operations, especially for Bus Rapid Transit and Express service, but these lanes could be underutilized and be a source of extra capacity if they could be shared in an intelligent way. This article explores the benefits of providing intermittent priority, called bus lane with intermittent and dynamic priority, of these exclusive bus lanes. Intermittent and dynamic priority can be implemented by allowing vehicles to use the lane when Bus Rapid Transit or Express bus is not present. Drivers can be alerted when a bus is in the lane using either infrastructure-based signs, or in the future using infrastructure-to-vehicle, or connected vehicle communications. Some critical operating parameters for implementing bus lane with intermittent and dynamic priority system including clear distance, degree of saturation (volume-to-capacity ratio), connected vehicle penetration, and bus departure/headway frequency have been investigated in this paper.
Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)
Development and evaluation of bus lanes with intermittent and dynamic priority in connected vehicle environment
Exclusive bus lanes provide a very high level of priority for transit operations, especially for Bus Rapid Transit and Express service, but these lanes could be underutilized and be a source of extra capacity if they could be shared in an intelligent way. This article explores the benefits of providing intermittent priority, called bus lane with intermittent and dynamic priority, of these exclusive bus lanes. Intermittent and dynamic priority can be implemented by allowing vehicles to use the lane when Bus Rapid Transit or Express bus is not present. Drivers can be alerted when a bus is in the lane using either infrastructure-based signs, or in the future using infrastructure-to-vehicle, or connected vehicle communications. Some critical operating parameters for implementing bus lane with intermittent and dynamic priority system including clear distance, degree of saturation (volume-to-capacity ratio), connected vehicle penetration, and bus departure/headway frequency have been investigated in this paper.
+More
clear distance degree of saturation infrastructuretovehicle bus departureheadway frequency infrastructurebased signs intermittent and dynamic priority system ratio connected vehicle penetration
APA
MLA
Chicago
Larry Head,Wei Wu, Sanghuiyu Yan & Wanjing Ma,.Development and evaluation of bus lanes with intermittent and dynamic priority in connected vehicle environment. 22 (4),301-310.
Qiu, F., Li, W., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., & Xie, Q. (2015). Exploring suitable traffic conditions for intermittent bus lanes. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 49(3), 309–325. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Eichler, M. D. (2005). Bus lanes with intermittent priority: Assessment and design (Master dissertation. Master Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
Wu, W., Li, P., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Modelling and simulation of vehicle speed guidance in connected vehicle environment. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 14(1), 145–157. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Associates, I. (2003). TRB's transit cooperative research program (TCRP) report 100:Transit capacity and quality of service manual (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board. [Google Scholar]
Liu, Y., Dion, F., & Biswas, S. (2005). Dedicated short-range wireless communications for intelligent transportation system applications: State of the art. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1910, 29–37. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Viegas, J., & Lu, B. (2001). Widening the scope for bus priority with intermittent bus lanes. Transportation Planning and Technology, 24(2), 87–110. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Currie, C., & Lai, H. (2008). Intermittent and dynamic transit lanes: Melbourne, Australia, experience. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 21, 49–56. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Hengst, S., & Kautzsch, L. (2010). Driver model DLL interface for VISSIM5.30–00. Karlsruhe, Germany: PTV group. [Google Scholar]
Al-Deek, H., Sandt, A., Alomari, A., & Hussain, O. (2017). A technical note on evaluating the effectiveness of bus rapid transit with transit signal priority. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(3), 227–238. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
He, Q. (2010). Robust-intelligent traffic signal control within a vehicle-to-infrastructure and vehicle-to-vehicle communication environment. (PhD. dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson. [Google Scholar]
Chiabaut, N., Xie, X., & Leclercq, L. (2012). Road capacity and travel times with bus lanes with intermittent priority activation: Analytical investigations. 91th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
Vuchic, V. R. (2007). Urban transit systems and technology. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Sakamoto, K., Abhayantha, C., & Kubota, H. (2007). Effectiveness of bus priority lane as countermeasure for congestion. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2034, 103–111. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Viegas, J., Roque, R., Lu, B., & Vieira, J. (2007). Intermittent bus lane system: Demonstration in Lisbon, Portugal. The 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
Deng, T., & Nelson, J. D. (2011). Recent developments in bus rapid transit: A review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 31(1), 69–96. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Zhu, H. B. (2010). Numerical study of urban traffic flow with dedicated bus lane and intermittent bus lane. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(16), 3134–3139. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Wang, M., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Arem, B. V. (2016). Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Technology Planning & Operations, 20(6), 559–572. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Guler, S. I., & Cassidy, M. J. (2012). Strategies for sharing bottleneck capacity among buses and cars. Transportation Research Part B, 46(10), 1334–1345. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Viegas, J., & Lu, B. (2004). The intermittent bus lane signal setting within an area. Transportation Research Part C, 12(6), 453–469. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Eichler, M., & Daganzo, C. F. (2006). Bus lanes with intermittent priority: Strategy formulae and an evaluation. Transportation Research Part B, 40(9), 731–744. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Carey, G., Bauer, T., & Giese, K. (2009). Bus lane with intermittent priority (BLIP) concept simulation analysis. FTA-FL-26-7109.2009.8. FTA. U.S.: Department of Transportation. [Google Scholar]
Select your report category*
Reason*
New sign-in location:
Last sign-in location:
Last sign-in date: