Welcome to the IKCEST

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) | Vol.19, Issue.2 | | Pages 137-41

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)

Comparison of subjective visual acuity with visual acuity predicted from C-scan topography.

Show-Chuan, Tsai I-Jong, Wang Shiow-Wen, Liou Wei-Li, Chen Yuan-Chieh, Lee Gow-Lieng, Tseng Fung-Rong, Hu  
Abstract

To compare the capability of objective measures of visual acuity (potential visual acuity from C-scan) to predict subjective visual acuity (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA]).Patients with BSCVA > or = 20/20 were enrolled in four groups (Group 1: normal [33 eyes]; Group 2: < -7.00 D myopia [43 eyes]; Group 3: > or = -7.00 D myopia [28 eyes]; Group 4: At least 1 month after LASIK [93 eyes]). Videokeratography was performed with the ray tracing Technomed C-scan. The potential visual acuity from C-scan was obtained with pupils undilated and intact precorneal tear films. All visual acuity was recorded in logMAR, and the significance of differences between acuities was assessed with a one-way ANOVA test.The potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing of normal and myopic eyes in response to both photopic and mesopic stimuli did not differ. In a given eye, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing was better than BSCVA, and the difference was statistically significant. Although the potential visual acuity from C-scan of postoperative LASIK eyes in response to photopic stimuli was the same, it decreased under mesopic conditions.Potential visual acuity from C-scan overestimates subjective visual acuity due to the inadequate assumptions in ray tracing or individual retinal resolution ability. In addition, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing varies with pupil diameter in different illumination.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

Comparison of subjective visual acuity with visual acuity predicted from C-scan topography.

To compare the capability of objective measures of visual acuity (potential visual acuity from C-scan) to predict subjective visual acuity (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA]).Patients with BSCVA > or = 20/20 were enrolled in four groups (Group 1: normal [33 eyes]; Group 2: < -7.00 D myopia [43 eyes]; Group 3: > or = -7.00 D myopia [28 eyes]; Group 4: At least 1 month after LASIK [93 eyes]). Videokeratography was performed with the ray tracing Technomed C-scan. The potential visual acuity from C-scan was obtained with pupils undilated and intact precorneal tear films. All visual acuity was recorded in logMAR, and the significance of differences between acuities was assessed with a one-way ANOVA test.The potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing of normal and myopic eyes in response to both photopic and mesopic stimuli did not differ. In a given eye, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing was better than BSCVA, and the difference was statistically significant. Although the potential visual acuity from C-scan of postoperative LASIK eyes in response to photopic stimuli was the same, it decreased under mesopic conditions.Potential visual acuity from C-scan overestimates subjective visual acuity due to the inadequate assumptions in ray tracing or individual retinal resolution ability. In addition, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing varies with pupil diameter in different illumination.

+More

Cite this article
APA

APA

MLA

Chicago

Show-Chuan, Tsai I-Jong, Wang Shiow-Wen, Liou Wei-Li, Chen Yuan-Chieh, Lee Gow-Lieng, Tseng Fung-Rong, Hu,.Comparison of subjective visual acuity with visual acuity predicted from C-scan topography.. 19 (2),137-41.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
Translate engine
Article's language
English
中文
Pусск
Français
Español
العربية
Português
Kikongo
Dutch
kiswahili
هَوُسَ
IsiZulu
Action
Recommended articles

Report

Select your report category*



Reason*



By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit
Cancel