Movement times to the first target in a 2-target sequence are typically slower than in 1-target aiming tasks. The 1-target movement time advantage has been shown to emerge regardless of hand preference, the hand used, the amount of practice, and the availability of visual feedback. The authors tested central and peripheral explanations of the 1-target advantage, as postulated by the movement integration hypothesis, by asking participants to perform single-target movements, 2-target movements with 1 limb, and 2-target movements in which they switched limbs at the first target. Reaction time and movement time data showed a 1-target advantage that was similar for both 1- and 2-limb sequential aiming movements. This outcome demonstrates that the processes underlying the increase in movement time to the 1st target in 2-target sequences are not specific to the limb, suggesting that the 1-target advantage originates at a central rather than a peripheral level.

+More

reaction time 2target sequences movement integration hypothesis level 2limb sequential aiming peripheral explanations movements 2target visual feedback 1target movement time advantage limb practice

Michael A, Khan Thomas M, Mottram Jos J, Adam Eric, Buckolz,.Sequential aiming with two limbs and the one-target advantage.. 42 (5),325-30.

Michael A, Khan Thomas M, Mottram Jos J, Adam Eric, Buckolz,"Sequential aiming with two limbs and the one-target advantage." 42

Michael A, Khan Thomas M, Mottram Jos J, Adam Eric, Buckolz,"Sequential aiming with two limbs and the one-target advantage."