Welcome to the IKCEST

Lancet (London, England) | Vol.364, Issue.9450 | | Pages 2055-7

Lancet (London, England)

Microscopic colitis: a missed diagnosis?

Ole Haagen, Nielsen Ben, Vainer Ove B, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell  
Abstract

Collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis, collectively designated microscopic colitis, have until recently been considered as rare gastrointestinal disorders. New data suggest, however, that these disorders are relatively common, and to reach the correct diagnosis both the gastroenterologist and the pathologist must be aware of these diagnoses when evaluating patients with persistent watery non-bloody diarrhoea.In an epidemiological study of a well-defined Swedish population, Martin Olesen and colleagues show that microscopic colitis needs to be considered as a common gastrointestinal disorder (Gut 2004; 53: 346-50). In colonic biopsy specimens from 1018 patients who had a colonoscopy because of non-bloody diarrhoea in 1993-98, 97 patients (9.5%) were found to have microscopic colitis. In about a third of these cases, the diagnosis was missed in the primary histological evaluation. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years for collagenous colitis and 59 years for lymphocytic colitis. The annual incidence of the diseases was higher than previously considered and matched the incidence of Crohn's disease, and in combination they approached the incidence of ulcerative colitis.The high regional incidence of microscopic colitis means that both clinicians and pathologists need to be more aware of the diagnosis, especially in the elderly female population with a clinical picture of watery non-bloody diarrhoea. Because of the potentially disabling symptoms, clinicians need to develop and evaluate new therapies.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

Microscopic colitis: a missed diagnosis?

Collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis, collectively designated microscopic colitis, have until recently been considered as rare gastrointestinal disorders. New data suggest, however, that these disorders are relatively common, and to reach the correct diagnosis both the gastroenterologist and the pathologist must be aware of these diagnoses when evaluating patients with persistent watery non-bloody diarrhoea.In an epidemiological study of a well-defined Swedish population, Martin Olesen and colleagues show that microscopic colitis needs to be considered as a common gastrointestinal disorder (Gut 2004; 53: 346-50). In colonic biopsy specimens from 1018 patients who had a colonoscopy because of non-bloody diarrhoea in 1993-98, 97 patients (9.5%) were found to have microscopic colitis. In about a third of these cases, the diagnosis was missed in the primary histological evaluation. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years for collagenous colitis and 59 years for lymphocytic colitis. The annual incidence of the diseases was higher than previously considered and matched the incidence of Crohn's disease, and in combination they approached the incidence of ulcerative colitis.The high regional incidence of microscopic colitis means that both clinicians and pathologists need to be more aware of the diagnosis, especially in the elderly female population with a clinical picture of watery non-bloody diarrhoea. Because of the potentially disabling symptoms, clinicians need to develop and evaluate new therapies.

+More

Cite this article
APA

APA

MLA

Chicago

Ole Haagen, Nielsen Ben, Vainer Ove B, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell,.Microscopic colitis: a missed diagnosis?. 364 (9450),2055-7.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
Translate engine
Article's language
English
中文
Pусск
Français
Español
العربية
Português
Kikongo
Dutch
kiswahili
هَوُسَ
IsiZulu
Action
Recommended articles

Report

Select your report category*



Reason*



By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit
Cancel